Site A

• Functional scoring rank: #3
• Accessibility: minimal improvements needed
• Adjacencies: minimal impact
• Developability: moderately difficult because of demolition
• Infiltrative soils: must discharge to surface waters
• Fuel consumption from base: less than 5% charging loss
• Site configuration: rectangular with one frontage to support site operations.
• Environmental Justice Impacts: >20% of census tract.
• Utility availability: storm and sewer utility service lines between 500 feet and 0.25 mile; remaining utilities less than 500 feet to service line
• 2nd Tier Critical Area Setbacks/Mitigation: no Critical Area mitigation
• 2nd Tier Displacement: 20 jobs, 300 organizational personnel

TIME FACTORS

• Acquisition – Two parcels (one partial take) with multiple ownership. Only two property owners.
• Land Use – Will require zoning change and comp plan amendment.
• Permitting – Standard site development permits. Not environmental encumbrances. 
• Construction – Demolition of old Elks Lodge.

FUNCTIONALITY

• Access – Requires travel through urban/suburban grid and crossing of bridges to reach Charleston Base. Time in minutes: 15.
• Maintenance/Replacement – Seismic soils and steep slopes in northwest corner. Retaining walls recommended.
• Flexibility – No room for future expansion
• Septic/Sewer – Sewer

DEVELOPABILITY

• Site Prep – Some demolition
• Grading/Drainage/Utilities – Easy grading; infiltrative soils, and access to utilities.
• Access – Straight/Flat access only one access to Pine. Limited frontage improvements.
• Risk – Straightforward construction.
• Community – Development would require relocating Elks Lodge.

COST

• Administrative Cost = 10% plus relocation of Elks Lodge.
• Assessed Value = $1,582,000
• Design/Permitting Costs = 12%
• Development Costs = TBD

ENVIRONMENTAL

• No wetlands or streams were observed.